Freedom in Education Policy Brief

Freedom in Education Policy Brief

Issued by: The Freedom in Education Media Team 

Release Date: March 2, 2026

     This month’s brief discusses the literacy crisis in American K-12 education, highlighting shifts in instructional methodology, the expanding role of artificial intelligence (AI) in classrooms, and emerging state-level policy responses. As reading proficiency declines and concerns about comprehension, equity, and digital dependency intensify, educators, lawmakers, and key players alike are reconsidering how students learn to read and what structures most effectively support long-term literacy and student success.

IN THE NEWS

News articles and analyses underscore the growing K-12 literacy crisis in America, with a particular emphasis on changing instructional methodology, shifting resources, and new concerns. 

In a book excerpt published by Edutopia, the authors name “passage-based” and “choice-based” literacy models to the readers’ attention, arguing that both methods reduce the chance that a book’s full, intended meaning and dilute the experience of diligently reading.

      • Passage-based instruction often involves students reading new excerpts from a novel each day, while choice-based instruction allows students to choose their own books. The article from Edutopia argues that passages cause students to lose narrative comprehension and that, when selecting their own reading materials, students are unlikely to choose something truly impactful.

In this piece by Janice Mak, a professor from Arizona State University, discusses the results of a survey she distributed amongst educators. Notably, the data indicates that while states are working to develop blanket AI plans for K-12 schools, local decisions still “dominate” — leaving school districts responsible for most of the development. 

      • Naturally, this has led to uneven outcomes throughout states and across demographics. While a litany of teachers report incorporating AI into their instruction, the guardrails and efficacy of these tools when teaching literacy has yet to be assessed.

NPR takes a more cynical position, reporting on the findings from a Brookings Institution study claiming that the risks of AI in education “overshadow” the benefits. To conduct its research, Brookings connected with a wide-ranging group of K-12 students, parents, educators, and tech experts in more than 50 countries. 

      • While a few “Pros” featured in the article concede that AI can “help” with reading skills and supplant the skills of a real human teacher, the opportunities to cognitively “off-load” — or pass off the real “thinking work” — are vast, which critically stymies the mental effort needed from students to master literacy. 

EdSurge published a piece by a North Carolina teacher Terri Ashchi centering around a phrase one of her multilingual students used: “I read the word, but I don’t know what it means.” This sentiment reflects how much of public literacy teaching focuses on decoding versus deep comprehension, but Ashchi also points out that multilingual students and students of color have a harder time with the latter because of cultural differences and experience gaps. 

      • She suggests selecting culturally relevant books, encouraging learners to discuss their ideas about what they are reading, and teaching vocabulary with more intention and context. 

Baseline literacy statistics and facts from the National Literacy Institute, capturing data from the most recent (2024-2025) completed school year:

    • 54% of U.S. adults read at a sixth-grade level. 
    • America ranks 36th globally in literacy.
    • There are provable links between illiteracy, poverty, and incarceration.

READING AND TECHNOLOGY

     A piece from Reading Rockets, an organization focused on childrens’ literacy, discusses “responsibly” integrating face-to-face learning with digital tools, as the risk for “passive instruction” is high. For example, “e-books” (online books) can create unengaged reading habits and feature distracting elements, leading to a loss of focus. The source argues — like others — that digital technology should assist, and not replace, reading instruction. 

     Interestingly, to combat this potential for intellectual atrophy, writers from nonprofit The Albert Shanker Institute propose “biliteracy,” which involves tailoring methodology to develop skills in print consumption and digital consumption.

LEGISLATION TO WATCH: CASE STUDIES

State Context
Ohio — House Bill 96 What happened?

  • In early January 2026, the Ohio Department of Education relayed that the Ohio House passed Section 3301.24. This House Bill mandates that all public school districts, community schools, and STEM schools “must adopt a formal AI policy by July 1, 2026,” going as far as providing a template developed in collaboration with Ohio’s AI in Education Coalition; the organization formed when the then-Lt. Governor of Ohio, Jon Husted, convened a group of public stakeholders and businesses to create a standardized AI strategy. 

What are the implications for literacy/student success?

  • The provision shifts much of the workload onto districts, recommending that they “Form a comprehensive AI workgroup to shape policy and implementation” and “Establish a policy governing the use of AI in schools” (even with a provided template). Although Ohio seems to recognize the rapid omnipresence of AI, the remaining gray area and policy variation district-to-district may leave some Ohio students behind in crucial areas like literacy. 
Washington State — Senate Bill 5956 What happened?

  • Washington State’s 69th Legislature introduced SB 5956 in January, and it is currently moving through the House with more readings on the horizon. The bill stipulates that AI cannot be used to formulate “risks scores” for students, aiming to ensure technology systems do not replace the discretion of professionals. It also forbids school systems from incorporating AI into disciplinary decisions or considering likelihood of misconduct, gang affiliation, criminal behavior, or other factors. 

What are the implications for student success? 

  • Though relating less to literacy, this legislative step reflects an inherent awareness of the “school-to-prison pipeline.” By shifting the focus from AI to the situational awareness of experienced, present educators, the likelihood of inequitable punishment lessens. Unsurprisingly, Washington State currently incorporates “science of reading” techniques into its literacy models. 

NAEP: WHAT IS IT?

     To understand conversations about literacy, it is equally important to understand NAEP.

  • NAEP stands for the “National Assessment for Educational Progress,” which is the name of the standardized test. 
    • The assessment — which takes various forms across subjects including reading, math, writing, and science — is only administered to a select sample of students nationwide in 4th, 8th, and 12th grade. 
    • NAEP scores in reading have plummeted in recent years, reaching “below basic levels” in literacy skills. 
  • NAEP is often used by districts and policymakers to assess performance in their respective regions, and it remains the only source that provides a country-wide picture of student success.

FREEDOM IN EDUCATION FEATURE: GOOD BOOK DRIVE

     To do its part in aiding the literacy crisis, Freedom in Education hosts the Good Book Drive by partnering with publishers and distributors to get quality books into the hands of students for free. 

    • To commemorate America’s 250th birthday, the Patriotic Book Drive’s goal is to send 250 book bundles of American history-adjacent texts to classrooms and libraries across the U.S.  
  • To learn more, visit us here.

📧 Contact Us: press@freedomined.org

Policy
Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top